Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, J., pro tem.
This is an action for the recovery of $30,000, with interest from September 11, 1918, claimed by plaintiff to be payable to him by reason of the sale of a tract of land comprising 156 acres and forming part of a parcel known as tract 30, situated in the Oakland harbor and belonging to the defendants.
The ease was tried before a jury, which rendered a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for the full amount of his claim against both defendants. From the judgment thereupon entered the defendants have appealed.
The land in question was conveyed on September 11, 1918, to the United…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Sussdorff v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Lloyd v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Stewart v. MatherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Brea v. McGlashanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hume v. Fresno Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.