Legal Opinion
County of San Diego v. Childs
California Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14619PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as county surveyor of San Diego County, to prepare a diagram and to make the reassessment described in the petition, and in accordance with the Refunding and Reassessment Act approved June 15, 1931. (Stats. 1931, p. 1861.)
Some time prior to October 7, 1929, the board of supervisors instituted proceedings for extensive public improvements in certain unincorporated territory in said county pursuant to the Acquisition and Improvement Act of 1925. (Stats. 1925, p. 849, as amended.) The lands declared to be benefited…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Pauline Rust v. Paul Johnson and Nora Johnson, City of Los Angeles v. Paul Johnson, Nora Johnson, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Loew's Inc. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.