Legal Opinion
Pauline Rust v. Paul Johnson and Nora Johnson, City of Los Angeles v. Paul Johnson, Nora Johnson, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 13, 1979No. 77-2493, 77-2602PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEMPLAR, District Judge.
This case arises out of the foreclosure of a street improvement bond on a parcel of property located at 342 East 105th Street in Los Angeles, California. The foreclosure resulted in two parties claiming title to the property and in a dispute over the power of the City of Los Angeles to foreclose on property in which the United States holds an interest.
FACTS
On August 14, 1971, the City of Los Angeles (City) assessed the property for street improvements in the amount of $158.36 and issued a bond to pay the assessment. At the time of the assessment, the Federal National…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. BagamasbadSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Fidelity Financial Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, Milton Feinerman, President of the Federal Home Loan Bank of S.F.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Simon v. CebrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Matagorda County v. Russell LawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- John L. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, a United States Corporation v. Metrocentre Improvement District 1, City of Little Rock, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.