Legal Opinion
City of Norwalk v. Farrell
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 9, 2003No. AC 22470PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*401 Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
This real estate tax foreclosure action was instituted by the plaintiff, the city of Norwalk, against the defendant James J. Farrell, Jr., and, subsequently, against Sperry A. DeCew, administrator cum testamento annexo of the estate of James J. Farrell, Jr., and against James J. Farrell III and Patricia Farrell-Kowalonek. James J. Farrell III is the only defendant involved in the present appeal. He appeals from the judgment of the trial court requiring him to pay $2803.60 in fees to Robert F. Maslan, Jr., an attorney, who was appointed by the court to serve as the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Opoku v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Thalheim v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. BurgosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Duplissie v. DevinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Roos v. RoosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. GilmoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Grant v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. JamesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.