Legal Opinion
State v. James
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 3, 2006No. AC 25328PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The defendant, Joseph Alexander James, entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charges of criminal attempt to possess a controlled substance with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 1 and 21a-277 (b), 2 and possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (b), and appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress, which he filed pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a. Specifically, he claims that the arresting police officers improperly advised him of his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Campfield v. Stickman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- James v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. CrespoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Bridgeport Fire Fighters Local 998 v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. GardnerConnecticut Superior Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.