Grant v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether the habeas court abused its discretion by denying the petition for certification to appeal filed by the petitioner, Robert M. Grant. The court granted the motion to dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas coipus filed by the respondent, the commissioner of correction, because the petitioner was not in custody at the time he filed the petition. We dismiss the appeal.
The following facts are necessaiy for our resolution of this appeal. On September 29, 1988, the petitioner pleaded guilty to the crimes of larceny in the third degree and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Garlotte v. FordiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Vincenzo v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Young v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Heaven v. Timber Hill, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. LeakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Gaskin v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Quint v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.