Legal Opinion
Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. Gilmore
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 24, 2005No. AC 24700PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendants Bess P. Gilmore, Keith P. Gilmore and Douglas G. Gilmore 1 appeal from the prejudgment remedy order of the trial court author izing an attachment in the amount of $22,993.18 2 in favor of the plaintiff, the Connecticut Light and Power Company. On appeal, the defendants claim that (1) the court did not have the authority to issue a prejudgment remedy order authorizing an attachment in an amount less than the amount sought by the plaintiff in its application for prejudgment remedy, (2) if the court did have the authority to issue a prejudgment remedy order…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Tisdale v. Riverside Cemetery Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. LIBORIO A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Wells Fargo Bank of Minnesota, N.A. v. MorganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Solano v. CalegariConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.