Legal Opinion
Opoku v. Grant
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 12, 2001No. AC 20368PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The plaintiff, Nath Atta Opoku, appeals to this court following the denial of his motion to open the judgment of nonsuit1 that had been rendered against him as a result of his failure to comply with a discovery order. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that he failed to file the affidavit required by General Statutes § 52-212 and Practice Book § 17-43 in a timely fashion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. On August 6, 1995, a motor vehicle operated by the plaintiff collided…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kim v. MagnottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Jaser v. JaserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Cantoni v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- G. F. Construction, Inc. v. Cherry Hill Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. FordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- First National Bank of Chicago v. LueckenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. CunninghamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Intercity Development, LLC v. AndradeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Woodruff v. RileyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.