Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cornell v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1928No. 21296. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the lower court dismissing an action in mandamus, upon sustaining the demurrer of respondents to the complaint of appellants and notice by appellants that they would stand upon the allegations of their complaint.

The facts, as stated in the complaint, are summarized in the memorandum opinion of the trial judge as follows:

The city of Wenatchee is a municipal corporation of the third class of this state. On the first Monday in December, 1924, at a general municipal election, Wenatchee adopted the commission form of government. At a municipal election held…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State ex rel. Maltbie v. WillWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Anderson v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. James v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Twin Falls v. KoehlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bell v. Town of MabtonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Livingston v. AyerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State Ex Rel. Heffernan v. HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Cornell v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API