Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Heffernan v. Hoquiam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1936No. 25953. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is an action in mandamus to compel the issuance of city warrants in payment of a balance alleged to be due and owing' for services rendered to the city by a police officer. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, based upon which judgment was entered granting a peremptory writ of mandamus as prayed for. The city and its clerk have appealed.

The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, the substance of which we quote as follows:

The appellant city of Hoquiam is a municipal corporation of the second class, and as such is governed by Rem. Rev. Stat., §§ 9006-9089. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Knez v. SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Pike v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Scheller v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Rhodes v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Custer Con. Mines Co. v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Beck v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Ross v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Gallatin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API