Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cornell v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1930No. 21296. En BancPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Main, J.

Plaintiffs being regularly elected commissioners of tbe city of Wenatchee, a city of the third class, which in December, 1924, adopted the commission form of government, instituted this action for the purpose of procuring a writ of mandate requiring defendants Smith and Tibbetts, as clerk and treasurer, respectively, of the city of Wenatchee, to issue to plaintiff Cornell, as mayor of the city, salary warrants in the sum of $166.66 per month and to plaintiff Sterling, as city commissioner, salary warrants at the rate of $150 per month, instead of at lesser rates, which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. White v. . ConnellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. State ex rel. Maltbie v. WillWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Anderson v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Livingston v. AyerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API