Bell v. Town of Mabton
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
— By ordinance number 123, the town of Mabton, during the month of January, 1914, fixed the duties of its “water commissioner,” although it did not create that or any other office. By ordinance number 141, approved February 13, .1917, the mayor was authorized to appoint certain town “officers,” including ‘ ‘ one waterworks commissioner who shall perform the duties prescribed by ordinance number 123; ’ ’ also,
“ . . . one meter reader, whose duty it shall be to take an accurate reading of each water meter in service, at the end of each month, and record same under proper heading in a book to be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Murphy v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Scheller v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. Lysons v. RuffWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Rhodes v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Knez v. SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Pike v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Ausburn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Chatfield v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Peterson v. City of ParsonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.