Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Maltbie v. Will

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1909No. 7506PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Douglas county, Steiner, J., entered May 6, 1908, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial before the court without a jury, in an action for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Application to the superior court of Douglas county by A. N. Maltbie, for a writ of mandamus requiring the auditor and commissioners of said county, to issue a warrant for $394.45, alleged to be due the relator for salary as county clerk. From a final judgment denying the writ, the relator has appealed.

The only question presented is whether the findings made require the issuance of a writ. The trial court found that the relator, A. N. Maltbie, was elected clerk of Douglas county in November, 1903, and re-elected in November, 1904; that he served two terms, from January 9, 1903, to January 14,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wolfe v. ParmenterWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Brown v. McQuadeWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Anderson v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State ex rel. Davis v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. KeeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Osborn v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Stiftel v. MalarkeySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Pacific Bridge Co. v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1941

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API