Legal Opinion

City of Twin Falls v. Koehler

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1942No. 6983PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.

— Twin Falls is a municipal corporation of the second class, operating under the “Commission Form of Government.” (Chaps. 30 to 36, inclusive, Title 49,1. C. A.) Respondents, Taber and Avant, were elected in April, 1937, as city councilmen and began serving their respective four-year terms May 1, 1937. Respondents Dean and Ritchey, elected in April, 1939, began serving like terms May 1, 1939. Koehler, also a respondent, was elected mayor of the city April 25, 1939, and began his two-year term of office, May 1, 1939.

At the time of the election of the above named officials, the city of Twin…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Graham v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Woodring v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Puterbaugh v. WadhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Holcomb v. SpikesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Lewis v. Lackawanna CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sonja Lujan, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kimberly Lujan, Deceased v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Cahill v. LeopoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Varble v. WhitecottonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. Ludwig v. Board of County Com'rs of Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Belmont v. BlackOregon Supreme Court · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API