Legal Opinion

Bureau of Support in the Department of Mental Hygiene & Correction v. Kreitzer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1968No. 68-73PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneideR, J.

The state of Ohio, through the Bureau of Support in the Department of Mental Hygiene and Correction, brought this action to compel the cotrustees under a testamentary trust to reimburse it for care and support furnished by it to the trust beneficiary, Naomi M. Swallow, an adult, mentally incompetent patient in the Dayton State Hospital. The portion of the will involved reads as follows:

“. . . [I]n the event a share is established upon my death for the benefit of my daughter,.Naomi M. Swallow, the trustee shall distribute, in its sole and absolute discretion, so much of the income and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Union Life Ins. v. DeitschOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Lackmann v. Department of Mental HygieneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Sherman v. . SkuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Cooper v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. McDonald v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Matthews v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Scott v. Bank One Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Martin v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Tremaine v. TremaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Bohac v. GrahamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API