Martin v. Martin
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.
Appellants’ arguments are encompassed in three propositions of law, which state as follows:
1. “A trust which provides that distributions shall be made in the sole and absolute discretion of the trustee is a discretionary trust and as such is not subject to being-reached by a creditor’s bill brought by a creditor of one of the beneficiaries. ’ ’
2. “A divorced wife holding an out-of-state lump sum alimony award reduced to an Ohio judgment has no different status nor greater rights than any other judgment creditor.”
3. “A trust which terminates at a specified date and which is to be distributed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Bureau of Support in the Department of Mental Hygiene & Correction v. KreitzerOhio Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by24 opinions
- Matthews v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Domo v. McCarthyOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Scott v. Bank One Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of KelleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
- In Re WigginsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.