Legal Opinion

Federal Union Life Ins. v. Deitsch

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1934No. 24221PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

The issue presented here is between the Federal Union Life Insurance Company and Maggie Kerbel, neither of whom appears to be satisfied with the judgment and decree of the Court of Appeals. While Maggie Kerbel’s dissatisfaction is expressed in her brief, she has filed no cross-petition in error, and we can offer her no condolence.

The Federal Union Life Insurance Company claims priority in the Stanton avenue property to the extent of $8,978.99, the amount it paid to the Western Bank & Trust Company to satisfy its first mortgage on the Stanton avenue property, by right of subrogation.

This issue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin v. UnderwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Dreese v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Bureau of Support in the Department of Mental Hygiene & Correction v. KreitzerOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Bavely v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Cowan)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API