Legal Opinion

Scott v. Bank One Trust Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1991No. 89-1655PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Per curiam

The federal district court has certified the following questions to this court:

“1. Is Rule XVI of the Ohio Supreme Court Rules of Procedure [providing for federal certification of state-law questions] constitutional under [A]rticle IV, [S]ection 5 of the Ohio Constitution?
“2. Whether spendthrift trusts are valid and enforceable under Ohio law. Specifically, is the spendthrift clause contained in the Brewer Trust enforceable under Ohio law?”

Scott contends that both questions should be answered “no.” Bank One contends that they should be answered “yes.”

I

This case comes here pursuant to Section…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of ThibodauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W. S. Ranch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Grover v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Super Sulky, Inc. v. United States Trotting AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. L.A. All. for Survival v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Shebester v. Triple Crown InsurersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API