Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1945No. 30300PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart,-J.

Where, by the terms of a testamentary trust created and being administered in another state, the trustees are authorized, but not required, to make distribution of unexpended income from the trust to the legatee of one of the beneficiaries, does such legatee, a resident of this state, who has received distribution of income under such trust and who, upon the termi- ■ nation of the trust, will receive one-seventh of the corpus of the trust, have a taxable interest in this state, the value of which is based upon the income yield from the trust investment paid to such legatee as income…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Blodgett v. SilbermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Graves v. SchmidlappSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Morgan v. MorganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Rowe v. BradenOhio Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bureau of Support in the Department of Mental Hygiene & Correction v. KreitzerOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Estate of Seitz v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1975
  3. Lloyd v. CampbellCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API