State v. Chapin
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah.: John P. Xavanaugh, Judge. The defendant, W. H. Chapin, was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of larceny, and from the judgment and sentence imposed he appeals. The facts are set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
The' defendants, W. H. Chapin and E. C. Herlow, were charged by the grand jury of Multnomah County, Oregon, by an indictment returned on the 28th day of February, 1914, with the crime of larceny by bailee *349of $3,500, lawful money of the United States, the personal property of William Grace and Marion Anne Grace. On May 11, 1914, the defendants entered their pleas of not guilty. The March and April terms of court having intervened, in May defendant W. H. Chapin was tried separately, at his request, The jury, being unable to agree upon a verdict, were discharged, and on the 3d day of June, 1914,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. Leong QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- State v. CarmeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Amidon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Barber v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. BroadhurstOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.