Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1909PublishedCited by 81 opinions

From Multnomah: George H. Burnett, Judge. Statement by MR. Justice Eakin. This defendant, J. Thorburn Ross, is charged, by information, jointly with Geo. H. Hill, T. T. Burkhart, and John E. Aitchison, with the crime of larceny, committed in Multnomah County, Oregon, and upon change of venue the case was transferred to Marion County for trial.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: George H. Burnett, Judge. Statement by MR. Justice Eakin. This defendant, J. Thorburn Ross, is charged, by information, jointly with Geo. H. Hill, T. T. Burkhart, and John E. Aitchison, with the crime of larceny, committed in Multnomah County, Oregon, and upon change of venue the case was transferred to Marion County for trial. The substance of the charge is that on the 9th day of September, 1907, the Title Guarantee & Trust Company (hereafter referred to as the “Trust Company”) was a corporation, carrying on a banking business of which the defendants were directors, and J. T.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eakin

1. The statute (B. & C. Comp.) upon whiclathis prosecution is based provides: ____

“Sec. 1807. If any person shall receive any money whatever for this State * * or shall have in his possession any money whatever belonging to such State * * and shall in any way convert to his own use any portion thereof * * such person shall be deemed guilty of larceny. * * ”

The first question for consideration relates to the character of the deposits made by the State Treasurer with the Trust Company, whether they were general or special, *458and this depends on the terms of the statute of 1907, under which the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Laverty v. . SnethenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. State v. SteevesOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People v. Detroit White Lead Works Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State v. . DriverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Workman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  5. Cannon v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API