People v. Leong Quong
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of conviction, and from an order denying a new trial in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Ferral, J.
1Opinion of the Court
McKee, J.:
The appellants, in this case, were convicted in the Court below of the crime of grand larceny, for stealing a horse and wagon, the alleged property of one Sang Hop. The commission of the offense was proved by unquestioned evidence. No exception is taken to the charge of the Court to the jury, but it is contended that the verdict is contrary to law, because of a variance between the information and evidence as to the name of the injured party.
On the trial of the case the owner of the property stolen testified that he had two names—a business name and a personal one. His personal name…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Commonwealth v. TrainorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. ChapinOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. AlieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. SilvermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.