Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State of Oregon v. Cahill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1956PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

The defendant Otto W. Cahill was indicted by the grand jury of Lincoln county for the crime of conversion of public funds in violation of OCLA, § 23-525 as amended by Oregon Laws 1941, ch 371, p 639. (See ORS 165.015.) The indictment alleges that

“The said Otto W. Cahill on the 1st day of February, 1954, in the said County of Lincoln and State of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there have in his possession and under his control a certain sum of money, to-wit, the sum of $750.00, which said sum of money was then and there the property of the Taft-Nelscott-Delake Water District, a…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. Port of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. . MeadowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. McLeanOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. BraleyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. MainsOregon Supreme Court · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API