Legal Opinion
Amidon v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1977No. 2511, 2512PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NO WITZ, CONNOR, ERWIN and BURKE, JJ. RABINO WITZ, Justice.
After trial by jury appellant Carol Sue Menard was found guilty of the crime of embezzlement by bailee1 and appellant Howard Amidon was found guilty of aiding and abetting Menard in violation of the same statutory provision.2 The superior court thereafter sentenced appellants each to serve a term of three years imprisonment.
In this appeal Amidon and Menard have raised numerous specifications of error ranging from challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence before the grand jury through a…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Dorman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Hawley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
- Amidon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.