Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cole, Judge:
Dogfish-liver oil, the merchandise in question, has been the subject of much previous litigation with respect to tariff classification. Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. v. United States, 10 Cust. Ct. 313, C. D. 773, affirmed in Same v. Same, 32 C. C. P. A. 56, C. A. D. 285, and Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., and Robert E. Landweer v. United States, 15 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 949. In each instance, the collector classified the merchandise as an advanced drug under paragraph 34 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 34),1 assessing duty at 10 per centum ad valorem, and the importer…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
- Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- City of St. Louis v. DreisoernerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Abercrombie v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Weather-Rite Sportswear Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Los Angeles Tile Jobbers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Ralston Purina Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.