Weather-Rite Sportswear Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
The merchandise the subject of these protests consists of rainwear made of synthetic rubber, i.e., rainwear in chief value of synthetic rubber. The said rainwear was colored yellow, red, orange, olive drab, charcoal grey, or black. The articles of colors, other than charcoal grey or black, were assessed with duty at the rate of 12% per centum ad valorem, by similitude under the provisions of paragraph 1559(a), as amended, of the Tariff Act of 1930, to the “manufactures of india rubber or gutta-percha, or of which these substances or either of them is the component material…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Abercrombie v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Harrigan Auto Parts Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miller Harness Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Diamond Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- J. M. Rodgers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Weather-Rite Sportswear Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Rettinger Raincoat Mfg. Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.