Legal Opinion

G. D. Searle & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 24, 1948No. C. D. 1138PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

Plaintiff, a pharmaceutical company, imported from Canada Packers, Ltd., of Edmonton, Canada, and entered at the port of Chicago, Ill., in February 1947, a shipment; described on the invoice as “Evaporated Ox Gall,” which was classified under the provision in paragraph 5 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 5), as modified by the trade agreement with Argentina, 77 Treas. Dec. 138, T. D. 50504, for “All medicinal preparations of animal origin, not specially provided for,” and accordingly assessed with duty at 12% per centum ad valorem. The assessment followed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fink v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Bogle v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Biological Raw Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  3. Chemical Specialties Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. Kachurin Drug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  5. Hebo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API