Legal Opinion

Eastman Kodak Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 12, 1951No. C. D. 1333PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 251, C. D. 1332, decided concurrently herewith, controls, disposition of the present case. The issues in both are identical and much of the voluminous proof offered by the respective parties appears in each case, malting both records substantially the same. Plaintiff’s counsel, in their brief, explain the condition in this way:

This case was tried concurrently with the Geo. S. Bush & Co. Inc., et al. v. United States, Protest No. 120086-K, which involved shark liver oil imported from Canada. Except for that,testimony…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. W. T. Grant Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. U. S. Vitamin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API