Legal Opinion

Vandegrift v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 20, 1925No. 2416PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Certain ovarian and pituitary cattle glands and different organs of cattle imported from the Argentine, South America, by H. K. Mul-ford & Co., of Philadelphia, and used by them in the manufacture of solutions for hypodermic injection were classified under paragraph 34 of the act of September 21, 1922, at 10 per centum ad valorem as a drug of animal origin advanced in value or condition by grinding' Paragraph 34 is as follows:

Drugs, such as barks, beans, berries, buds, bulbs, bulbous roots, excrescences, fruits, flowers, dried fibers, dried insects, grains, herbs, leaves, lichens, mosses,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frankfeld v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. R. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. B. L. Lemke & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  5. Judson Sheldon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API