Legal Opinion

Abercrombie v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 3, 1942No. C. D. 709PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kiiícheloe, Judge:

This suit is brought by plaintiff against the United States for the purpose of recovering certain duty alleged to have been wrongfully levied by the collector of customs at the port of New York on an importation of tarred hemp deck-tennis nets. Duty was assessed on the merchandise at- 40 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1023 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as manufactures wholly or in chief value of vegetable fiber, except cotton, not specially provided for. The merchandise is claimed by plaintiff to be properly dutiable at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Weather-Rite Sportswear Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Best Foods, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Will & Baumer Candle Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API