Legal Opinion

Andersen v. La Rinconada Country Club

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1935No. Civ. 9227PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment entered against defendant for a sum less than plaintiffs’ claim.

In 1928 the parties to this action entered into an agreement in writing for the sale and purchase of water to be used for irrigation and domestic purposes. The defendant owns and operates a country club and golf course. The contract recited that “upon the lands of the parties of the first part which adjoin the land of the party of the second part there is a well now equipped with a pumping plant which the parties of the first part believe will produce sufficient water to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vitagraph, Inc. v. Liberty Theatres Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Vickrey v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Burgess Sulphite Fibre Co. v. BroomfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Indiana-American Water Co. v. Town of SeelyvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Ross v. Frank W. Dunne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API