Legal Opinion
Ross v. Frank W. Dunne Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 14, 1953No. Civ. 8169PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Plaintiff and respondent commenced an action against defendant and appellant for damages for alleged breach of contract. The complaint alleged that defendant had granted plaintiff an exclusive distributorship for the sale of its “Color Suited System” in the territory extending from Marysville to the Oregon border, excluding Oroville; that in reliance on this, plaintiff ordered products costing approximately $2,000 from defendant which he distributed to his dealers, and took orders for the product from other customers in the territory; that contrary to the terms of the agreement defendant has…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Estate of ReinhertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Foley v. EulessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Lohn v. Fletcher Oil Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Three-Seventy Leasing Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Ampex Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Xebec Development Partners, Ltd. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Sweet v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.