Legal Opinion

Bihlmire v. Hahn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

Denial of a Fair Hearing.

Mr. Hahn claims that Mr. Bihlmire corrupted these proceedings by a series of improper communications to the trial judge. The record shows that Mr. Bihlmire sent eight letters and one telegram to Judge Zastrow. In these communications he characterized Mr. Hahn as a professional litigant and accused him of submitting a fraudulent bid. He also accused Mr. Hahn of neglecting his children and of having swindled naive elderly ladies of over $100,000. He asserted that Mr. Hahn had a twenty-year reputation of nonpayment and a history of corrupting attorneys and judges.

These…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Watson v. Milwaukee & Madison Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  2. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. County CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Rubin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Feuerstein v. KalbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Northwestern Loan & Trust Co. v. BidingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BraunsdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Home Bank v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hales Corners Savings & Loan Asso. v. KohlmetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Pinczkowski v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Voluntary Assignment of Linton v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API