Legal Opinion

Rubin v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1927PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

The defendant is a practicing attorney of long experience. He has a thorough understanding of professional ethics, the relations that should obtain between court and counsel, and that degree of respect due from the bar to the court. In his brief the defendant gives expression to rather high-minded abstract principles which he concedes *6should prevail in the conduct of court proceedings. For instance, he says:

"We firmly hold that in the interest of justice there should be orderly procedure; that a proceeding in court should at all times be dignified; that neither judge nor attorney should,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Dietz v. City of NeenahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. In re RosenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. BraunsdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Schofield Discipline CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. CONTEMPT IN STATE v. DewerthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API