Legal Opinion

Hales Corners Savings & Loan Asso. v. Kohlmetz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Before considering the merits of this appeal it is first necessary to consider respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the purchaser at the second confirmation sale was not served by the appellant with a notice of appeal. We deny the motion.

The pertinent rule governing the manner of taking appeals provides, in part, as follows:

“Appeal, how taken and perfected; notice; costs. (1) An appeal is taken by serving a notice of appeal signed by the appellant or his attorney on each party adverse to him upon the appeal who appeared in the action or proceeding, and by filing a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gumz v. ChickeringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Findorff v. FindorffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Bihlmire v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Rogers v. ShoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Franklin v. Badger Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Home Bank v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. HarlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. MoffettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Andersen v. Village of Little ChuteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API