Legal Opinion

State v. Braunsdorf

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1980No. 79-095-CRPublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam G. Callow, J.

We granted review in order to consider whether the trial courts of this state have the inherent authority to dismiss with prejudice a criminal case prior to the attachment of jeopardy. We conclude that, except for those situations in which a defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial is implicated, the trial court possesses no such inherent authority; and we therefore affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

Defendant-respondent-petitioner Sharon Braunsdorf (defendant) was charged with welfare fraud; and after a preliminary examination, the case was scheduled for a jury trial as…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. In Re United States of America, United States of America v. Ray Cowan and Jack Jacobsen, Wayne O. Woodruff, Special ProsecutorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. AbbatiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. State v. MoriwakeHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Friedrich v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Flynn v. Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API