Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Martin
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 2009No. 09AP-294PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Klatt, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Citynet Ohio, L.L.C., Citynet Holdings, L.L.C., Citynet, L.L.C. (“Citynet”), and James R.J. Martin II1 (collectively, “defen*415dants”), appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas ordering them to produce forensic copies of computer hard drives to plaintiffappellee, Duane C. Bennett. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
{¶ 2} Bennett initiated this lawsuit on September 3, 2004, with a complaint alleging claims for age discrimination in violation of R.C. 4112.02(A), retaliation in violation of R.C.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Nakoff v. Fairview General HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- John B. v. GoetzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Weekley Homes, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Frash v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Frash v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Northeast Professional Home Care, Inc. v. Advantage Home Health Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. Glenn (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Wynmoor Community Council, Inc. v. QBE InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.