Legal Opinion
John B. v. Goetz
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 26, 2008No. 07-6373PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J., joined by Gibbons, J.,
COLE, J. (pp. 461-62), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
State defendants seek mandamus relief from two discovery orders issued by the district court during the course of this class-action litigation. The district court issued the orders after a discovery dispute arose regarding defendants’ duty to preserve and produce electronically stored information relevant to the litigation. In the first order, the district court directed plaintiffs’ computer expert and a court-appointed monitor to inspect the state’s computer system and the computers of 50 key…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- O'BRIEN v. Ed Donnelly Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Hytera Commc'ns Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- In Re Professionals Direct InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Ashton Ex Rel. Estate of Ashton v. Knight Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.