Legal Opinion
Peskoff v. Faber
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 27, 2007No. Civil Action No. 04-526 (HHK/JMF)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
As indicated in earlier opinions, the central question dividing these parties is the sufficiency of the search done by the defendant Michael Faber for emails and other eleetroni*55cally stored information in response to plaintiff Jonathon Peskoffs discovery requests. Specifically, Peskoff seeks emails from his tenure with NextPoint Management (“Next-Point”) that he argues “are highly likely to contain information relating to the ownership issues in this case, the suspect transactions identified in the Complaint and other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- McPeek v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Fonville v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Peskoff v. FaberCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Disability Rights Council v. Washington Metropolitan Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hubbard v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States ex rel. Carter v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Huthnance v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Caudle v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.