Legal Opinion

Hanley v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1902No. Nos. 13,234-(213)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by Charles S. Hanley, contestant, from an order of the district court for Cass county, McClenahan, J., denying his motion to amend his notice of contest.

1Per curiam

On May 14, 1902, a special election was held in the county of Oass upon a proposition to issue the bonds of tbe county to build a courthouse. The proposition was declared carried by the canvassing board. Thereupon, and on June 12, 1902, the appellant herein, an elector and freeholder of the county, served a notice of contest, as provided by G. S. 1894, § 195, setting forth the grounds of the contest. Thereafter, and on September 2, 1902, he moved the district court to amend his notice of contest. The court made its order denying the motion upon the ground that the court was without power to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Winona v. Minnesota Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  2. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Dewey v. LeonardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  4. Manwaring v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. City of Winona v. Minnesota Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. Kittson County State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Stromme v. RieckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Swanson v. AlworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Blied v. BarnardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API