Hoyt v. Kittson County State Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action by the vendee in a land contract for an accounting and for specific performance. There Avere findings for the defendant. The plaintiff moved in the alternative for amended findings or a neAV trial. Her motion was denied. The defendant moved for leave to file a supplemental answer alleging the cancelation of the land contract. The motion was granted. The plaintiff appealed from the order denying her motion to amend the findings and her motion for a new trial, and from the order granting the defendant’s motion to file a supplemental answer.
The order denying the motion for amended…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nash v. KirschoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Stromme v. RieckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Clark v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Hanley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Julius v. LenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Droege v. BrockmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Driessen v. MoeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- In Re Estate of WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Kiebach v. KiebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.