Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Kittson County State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 1930No. 27,588PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action by the vendee in a land contract for an accounting and for specific performance. There Avere findings for the defendant. The plaintiff moved in the alternative for amended findings or a neAV trial. Her motion was denied. The defendant moved for leave to file a supplemental answer alleging the cancelation of the land contract. The motion was granted. The plaintiff appealed from the order denying her motion to amend the findings and her motion for a new trial, and from the order granting the defendant’s motion to file a supplemental answer.

The order denying the motion for amended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nash v. KirschoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Stromme v. RieckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Clark v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Hanley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Julius v. LenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Droege v. BrockmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Driessen v. MoeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. In Re Estate of WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Kiebach v. KiebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API