Legal Opinion

City of Winona v. Minnesota Railway Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 10, 1882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from .a judgment of the district court for Steele county, where the action was tried by Stearns, J., (acting for the judge of the 5th district,) without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, J.'*'

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and presents for review (1) the action of the court below in allowing an amendment of the complaint; and (2) the correctness of the amount of the judgment. The action was originally commenced 1 in August, 1874, against the Minnesota Railway Construction Company and Horace Thompson, and has been three times before this court upon appeal. -The decisions upon such appeals are reported in 24 Minn. 199; 25 Minn. 328; and in 27 Minn. 415.

*69The general nature of the original issues appears in the report of the case in 24…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Winona v. Minnesota Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  2. Pierson v. McCahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Welsh v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  4. City of Winona v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  5. Gould v. Sub-District No. 3 of Eagle Creek School DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henry v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Barataria Canning Co. v. OttMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Todd v. BetttngenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Hanley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API