Blied v. Barnard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the decision in the former appeal reported in 126 Minn. 159, 147 N. W. 1095, defendant applied to the district court for Steele county for leave to serve a supplemental answer. From the order denying the application, Childress, J., defendant appealed.
1Per curiam
This case was before this court at the April, 1914, term, and .was remanded for a new trial unless defendant should consent to a reduction of the verdict. Blied v. Barnard, 126 Minn. 159, 147 N. W. 1095. As soon as the remittitur was filed in the lower court, defendant made an application to that court for permission to serve and file a supplemental answer which application was denied and he appealed from the order denying it. Such an order made before the trial is not appealable. Hanley v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Cass County, 87 Minn. 209, 91 N. W. 756; Stromme v. Rieck, 110 Minn. 472, 125…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stromme v. RieckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Hanley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Blied v. BarnardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- Swanson v. AlworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. HawleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Chicago Great Western Railroad v. ZahnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Greber v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926