Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Home Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, J., denying a motion for further findings of fact and conclusions of law, and denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action upon the insurance policy construed by this court in its decision, on a former appeal in this case, reported in 55 Minn. 236, 56 N. W. 815. After the cause was remitted to the district court, and before a new trial was had, the plaintiff, by order of the court, was permitted to amend its complaint. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, resulting in findings of fact and conclusions of law, in favor of the plaintiff, to the effect that it was entitled to recover of the defendant the sum of $28,607.28. From an order denying its motion for a new trial the defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- California Insurance v. Union Compress Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Shriver v. Sioux City & St. Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Home Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- City of Winona v. Minnesota Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nelson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
- Pettit Grain & Potato Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- James Quirk Milling Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Banner Laundry Co. v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Popa v. Northern InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.