Manwaring v. O'Brien
Supreme Court of Minnesota
, Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Washington county, Crosby, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Action in claim and delivery, brought by plaintiff, as an assignee in insolvency, to recover possession or the value of a stock of merchandise, consisting principally of boots and shoes, and store fixtures and furniture, of an alleged value of $20,000. The proceeding does not seem to have been instituted under the provisions of G. S. 1894, § 4243, for the allegations in the complaint are that the insolvents, prior to the assignment, had pretended to sell and had transferred the property in question to defendant, with intent to hinder, delay and defraud their creditors, of which intent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Hopkins v. LangtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Cohen v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Daniels v. Bank of ZumbrotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
3Cited by10 opinions
- Melady v. South St. Paul Live Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Gallagher v. Irish-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- O'Brien v. ManwaringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Stromme v. RieckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Hanley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.