Legal Opinion
Pope County Board of Commissioners v. Pryzmus
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 2004No. A03-1634PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant argues that the issues litigated in this proceeding were not identical to those previously litigated in another proceeding and challenges the district court’s use of collateral estoppel to grant respondent summary judgment. Because we find that appellant attempts to relitigate an issue identical to that decided previously, we affirm.
FACTS
In 1991, appellant John Pryzmus purchased land containing a one-level cabin on Lake Leven in Pope County, Minnesota. The cabin, built in 1972, had a setback of approximately 145 feet from the ordinary high-water level. On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Teaching License of Falgren v. State, Board of TeachingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Williamson v. PrasciunasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Shank v. Carleton CollegeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Barth v. StenwickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.