Legal Opinion
Williamson v. Prasciunas
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 20, 2003No. CX-02-1830PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORITSKY, Judge. *
Appellants Robert and Rebecca Prasciu-nas challenge (1) the district court’s decision to award respondent Patricia Rogers Williamson damages for civil conversion and (2) the court’s valuation of the property at issue. Respondent notes review of the district court’s denial of her motion to amend the complaint to seek punitive damages. Because we conclude that the district court: (1) properly ruled that appellants’ fraudulent concealment tolled the statute of limitations, (2) correctly valued the property, and (3) acted within its discretion when it denied punitive…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Ulrich v. City of CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Haberle v. BuchwaldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Onepoint Solutions, Llc, a Georgia Limited Liability Company v. Michael Borchert William CatuzziCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Berczyk v. Emerson Tool Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- In re Petters Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.