Legal Opinion

All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. Erickson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 2017No. A16-1780PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, JOHN, Judge

We affirm the judgment entered on a creditor’s suit that pierces the corporate veil to hold appellant personally liable for a judgment entered against a corporation in a previous action because the district court correctly (1) rejected appellant’s argument that recovery was barred by the creditor’s failure to exhaust remedies, laches, and unclean hands; (2) applied offensive collateral estoppel to hold appellant liable; and (3) amended the judgment to award post-judgment interest on the judgment.

FACTS

Appellant Roger üjrickson (Erickson) formed Erickson Contracting of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lupe Development Partners, LLC v. Deutsch (In re Deutsch)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Courtelis v. RosenbergDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  3. Graybow v. U.S. BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  4. Lindmark v. Saint John's UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  5. UMB Bank, N.A., solely in its capacity as successor trustee for the Bonds v. D. Jon Monson, et al.; Howard Yu, solely in his capacity as trustee of the estate of Anthony John Jacobson Trust v. UMB Bank, N.A., solely in its capacity as successor trustee for the BondsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API