Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Hibu, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 12, 2014No. Civ. No. 6:13-cv-00840-MCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
McSHANE, District Judge:
Between June 2010 and March 2011, plaintiff Paula Anderson worked as a media consultant for Hibu Inc. (formerly Yel-lowbook Inc.). In September 2010, plaintiff injured her wrist during a sales call. With defendant’s assistance, plaintiff filed a workers’ compensation claim which was subsequently accepted. Because plaintiffs wrist did not improve, she underwent surgery on January 18, 2011. Following her surgery, plaintiff was placed on leave of absence. After exhausting the leave period, plaintiff was terminated in accordance with company policy on…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Cortes-Diaz v. DL Reforestation, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022
- Dalfio v. SECVD & I, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Reid v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023