Legal Opinion
A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRicco
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 4, 1989No. 6492PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is the defendant’s appeal from a judgment granting foreclosure by sale of a mechanic’s lien. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in permitting the amount of damages to be established by an affidavit of debt, (2) in rendering judgment without a prior hearing in damages, (3) in denying his motion to set aside the judgment, (4) in denying the defendant’s motion to make Richard A. LoRicco a party defendant, and (5) in awarding the plaintiff attorney’s fees. We find no error.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. On September 29, 1986, the plaintiff commenced…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Town of Brookfield v. Candlewood Shores Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Lettieri v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Marsh, Day & Calhoun v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Costello v. Hartford Institute of Accounting, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Middlesex Insurance v. MaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Original Grasso Construction Co. v. ShepherdConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Pilato v. KapurConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- National Iron Bank v. GelorminoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Burns v. AdlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.